House votes to impeach
Comelec Chairman Bautista
MANILA, Philippines— The House of Representatives has overturned the
decision of its justice committee by voting to impeach Commission on Elections
Chairman Andres Bautista, who earlier in the day announced his decision to step down from his post at the end of this year.
During the plenary
debates on the complaint, 137 representatives voted to reject the committee
resolution that dismissed the impeachment charge against the poll chief while
75 House members voted to adopt it. Two representatives abstained during the
voting.
"The vote shows
that the resolution is overridden and pursuant to Section 11, Article 3 of the
Rules of Procedure in Impeachment Proceedings a vote of at least one-third of
all the members of the House shall be necessary to override such resolution. I
am directing the Committee on Justice to prepare the articles of impeachment
immediately," Deputy Speaker Raneo Abu (Batangas) said after receiving the
results of the voting.
The House Committee on
Justice earlier junked the impeachment case filed by lawyer Ferdinand Topacio and former Negros
Occidental Rep. Jacinto "Jing" Paras for
insufficiency in form.
The House has the
power to overturn the committee decision should one-third of its members vote
to do so.
The vote of the House
paves the way for the justice committee to prepare the articles of impeachment,
which will be sent to the Senate for an impeachment trial.
Rep. Edcel Lagman
(Albay), however, dismissed the notion that the articles of impeachment should
now be formulated after the plenary vote.
"Only form was
discussed and voted upon this afternoon. The plenary should return to the
committee on justice for further proceedings the complaint against Comelec
Chairman Andres Bautista," he said.
Reps. Gwendolyn Garcia
(Cebu) and Robert Ace Barbers (Surigao Del Norte) objected to the motion of
House Justice Committee Chairman Reynaldo Umali (Oriental Mindoro) for the
plenary to approve House Resolution 1397 dismissing the Paras-Topacio case.
According to Garcia
and Barbers, the case should proceed as they believe that the charges against
the Comelec chairman should be heard at the Senate sitting as an impeachment
court.
The two added that an
impeachment trial would give Bautista an opportunity to present his side and
defend himself from the allegations in the charge.
"It is perceived
that there was (sic) some infractions that was (sic) committed by no less than
the chairman of the commission. We never heard any reply to the allegations
being hurled at him," Barbers said during the plenary deliberations.
House Speaker
Pantaleon Alvarez (Davao Del Norte) also voted to reject the committee
resolution and said that the charges against Bautista were serious.
According to Umali, his committee dismissed the complaint since it did not
conform to the verification required by the rules of the House.
He added that no
authentic records were attached to the complaint to support the charges it
contained.
"The verification
stated that the complainants had personal knowledge and/or belief of the
allegations contained therein which is not consistent with what the rules
require that it must be based on authentic records," Umali explained.
Lagman, who voted to
affirm the resolution, said after the vote that the plenary should have
supported the decision of the justice panel.
He said that the
decision to override the panel resolution was a "no-confidence" vote
on Umali and the leadership of the committee.
"I think we
should have supported the integrity of our committee system," he said,
adding that the dismissal of the complaint has precedent.
The allegations in the
Paras-Topacio complaint were based on the accusations of Bautista's estranged
wife, Patricia, that the poll chief had wealth not reflected in his Statement
of Assets, Liabilities and Net Worth.
He also betrayed
public trust when he failed to adopt safeguards that could have prevented the data breach or hacking of the Comelec's website, the two
alleged.
Paras and Topacio said
the failure of Bautista to "promptly act" on the hacking of the
Comelec website constituted betrayal of public trust.
Another ground for
impeachment was obstruction of justice when the Comelec chairman cleared the
personnel of the poll body's technology provider, Smartmatic, and the IT
specialists of the electoral agency of any wrongdoing after they tweaked the
script of a program during the canvassing of the results of the May 2016
elections.
No comments:
Post a Comment